Wham!: A Story of Youth, Pop, the Zeitgeist and Elegant Divorce

I recently enjoyed a documentary about the British band Wham! (‘Wham!’ 2023, directed by Chris Smith)

Between 1982 and 1986 Wham! embodied the exuberance of youth, the hedonism of dance, the effervescence of pop. They brought fun, style and aspiration to a country worn down by unemployment and social unrest. And in so doing they captured the sprit of the age: the desire to get away, the yearning to escape. 

‘The songwriting was dictated by our circumstances, the environment around us. We were fusing rap with disco and then we added pop.’
Ridgeley

George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley met at Bushey Meads School, near Watford on the outskirts of London. Michael was shy, awkward and insecure about his weight. Ridgeley was confident, outgoing and disruptive. They bonded immediately, wrote comedy skits and songs together, went clubbing, and, at the age of 16, performed in a ska band that fizzled out after a year. 

Unperturbed, Michael and Ridgeley recorded a £20 demo tape on a 4-track portastudio in Ridgeley’s front room, using a microphone strapped to a broom. Calling themselves Wham!, they took the tape - which had just 3 songs on it, only one of them complete - to the offices of music companies in London. All to no avail. 

Nonetheless they persevered, eventually tracking down a record executive that lived nearby, and in 1982 they signed a deal at a local café. The duo’s first single ‘Wham Rap!’ was lauded in the music press for its fusion of disco pop with lyrics that recognised the plight of the jobless in Thatcher’s Britain. 

'Hey everybody take a look at me,
I've got street credibility.
I may not have a job,
But I have a good time,
With the boys that I meet down on the line.
Wham! Bam!
I am a man.
Job or no job, you can't tell me that I'm not.
Do you enjoy what you do?
If not, just stop.
Don't stay there and rot!’
‘Wham Rap!' (Enjoy What You Do) (G Michael, A Ridgeley)

However ‘Wham Rap’ failed to chart and so piled added pressure on the band’s second single. Initially ‘Young Guns’, released later the same year, also struggled. But by a stroke of luck, Wham! was given a slot on hugely influential TV show Top of the Pops after another act unexpectedly pulled out.

Now supplemented by backing vocalists Dee C Lee and Andrew’s girlfriend Shirlie Holliman, Wham! made quite an impression. With a jaunty tune, engaging lyrics and a synchronised dance routine that involved high claps, purposeful pointing and arms sweeping the floor, they captured the hearts of young viewers.

‘There was a certain energy to the naffness… We went and did it in my mum’s back room. No choreographer is gonna come up with that sh*t.’
Michael

‘Young Guns’ rose to number 3 in the charts and at last Wham! was up and running. 

Interviewer: What style of music do you think’s going to be big in the summer of ’83?
Ridgeley: Ours.

Wham!’s songs evolved from the socially conscious concerns of the early releases to embrace more hedonistic, carefree themes. They seemed to distil the attitude of a generation fatigued by industrial strife, recession and deprivation.

‘I think what’s happening in England is that there’s a large escapist element creeping back into music now. Three or four years ago with the punk thing people were shouting. Now they’re not ashamed of being young, unemployed. They’d rather just go to a disco or a club and forget about it.’
Michael

George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley in 1984. Photograph: Dpa Picture Alliance/Alamy

Pop had come to be regarded as trivial and ephemeral. Critics preferred angry rock, intelligent indie or cool jazz. But Wham! was proud to be a pop band, articulating broadly appealing romantic sentiments of optimism and escape.

‘Pop became a very dirty word in England for a good four or five years. We believe strongly in pop music as very valid. And I think people lost sight of that.’
Michael

There followed a succession of chart hits. Songs like ‘Club Tropicana’, ‘Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go’ and ‘I’m Your Man’ expressed youthful vitality, desire and a lust for life. Numbers like ‘Careless Whisper,’ ‘Everything She Wants’ and ‘Last Christmas’ conveyed a tender sense of longing and loss.

'Somebody told me
‘Boy, everything she wants is everything she sees.’
I guess I must have loved you,
Because I said you were the perfect girl for me.
And now we're six months older
And everything you want, and everything you see
Is out of reach, not good enough.
I don't know what the hell you want from me.’
'Everything She Wants’ (G Michael)

With Helen 'Pepsi' DeMacque replacing Dee C Lee, Wham! embarked on a series of jubilant UK and international tours. Here they are in leather jackets and jeans; in short shorts, singlets and white socks. Here’s Ridgeley in red sportswear, Michael in canary yellow. And here they're wearing their Choose Life tees; tartan jacket with bootlace tie; RayBans and big smiles. Fantastic!

With success the tours got larger, the hair bigger and the jacket shoulders broader.

Michael finally received the affirmation and acknowledgement that he deserved and needed. Winning the prestigious Ivor Novello award for songwriting in 1985 brought him to tears. At the ceremony Elton John testified to his talent.

‘Probably for me one of the best songwriters I’ve heard out of Britain for a long time. I mean people tend to put Wham! down as a teenie bopper band that won’t last. And the people that put them down are the bands that won’t last. I’m experienced enough to know that… I compare him to Barry Gibb, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, people like that. …The man’s a great songwriter.’

Wham! was the first Western pop group to tour China. It became one of the few British acts to make it in the United States. And it sold more than 30 million records worldwide. The duo played their farewell concert at Wembley in June 1986.

‘Wham! was never going to be middle-aged. Or be anything other than that essential and pure representation of us as youths.’
Ridgeley

There are lessons to be learned here. About the imperative of persistence at the beginning of one’s career; about the value of youthful inspiration and the power of pop; about staying attuned to the zeitgeist.

Wham! Club Tropicana tour in 1983

Wham! also provide a case study in elegant divorce. 

Soon into the enterprise Ridgeley recognised that Michael had a superior songwriting gift. And so he ceded creative control to him, initially as writer, and subsequently as producer. 

‘The goals we set ourselves could only be attained really with the quality of songwriting that he was able to produce.’
Ridgeley

Ridgeley also saw that Michael felt constrained by the expectations of a youth-targeted chart pop act - particularly as the singer had privately confided to him that he was gay. They both agreed that Michael should forge a career on his own. 

‘I think it’s what he should be doing. It allows his own artistic creativity to expand. Which you’ve got to do, I think.’
Ridgeley

Ridgeley, rather admirably, was happy to accept a backseat role, and then an exit.

Interviewer (Terry Wogan): What are you going to do when it stops?
Ridgeley: What am I going to do? Hopefully I’ll retire with grace. Or do something with grace.

George went on to a massively successful solo career, addressing more adult audiences with more sophisticated concerns, and selling over 120 million records. Ridgeley retired, with grace, to Cornwall to surf.

This re-telling of the Wham! story had a particular resonance for me. 

I grew up in a pebble-dashed, semi-detached house in Romford, a town on the edge of London not unlike Bushey. When I went to university in 1983, I was naturally drawn to students with similar suburban upbringings. My friends came from Croydon, Orpington and Wembley; Bournemouth, Bedford and, erm, Monmouth.

The Second Years wore greatcoats and earnest expressions. They listened with furrowed brows to Joy Division, Throbbing Gristle and Cabaret Voltaire. We on the other hand sported white socks and cut-down loafers, pastel-coloured shirts and tank tops. We sang along to the jukebox, choreographed our own amateurish moves and danced the night away to soul, pop and disco. Everything was joyous, exuberant, carefree.

Dubbed the Wham! Boys and Girls, we were often mocked for our levity and triviality. 

We didn’t care. Perhaps we too were in tune with the zeitgeist.

Wham! © Getty

'Every day it seems my smile's a little harder,
And every day I seem to laugh a little less.
Living this way it seems my sky's a little darker,
You went away and left me lonely in success.
Can't you see I'm falling apart?
Can't you see what's happening to me?’
‘Blue’ (G Michael)

No. 430

Carrie Mae Weems: Reframe, Rethink, React

‘Painting the Town #3’ (2021) © Carrie Mae Weems/Jack Shainman Gallery/Galerie Barbara Thumm

I recently attended an excellent exhibition of the work of artist Carrie Mae Weems. ('Reflections for Now’ is at the Barbican Art Gallery, London until 3 September.)

70-year-old Portland-born Weems trained as a dancer, before taking up photography and branching out into film, writing and installations. Her work explores identity, power, race and social justice. She wants to make us think.

'That there are so few images of African-American women circulating in popular culture or in fine art is disturbing; the pathology behind that is dangerous.'

On entering the first room we imagine that we are being presented with a compelling group of abstract expressionist paintings - large blocks of bold black and brown applied over softer colours. But then we realise that these are in fact digital photographs. We are looking at the graffitied, boarded-up buildings of Portland after the 2020 demonstrations over the murder of George Floyd. The authorities have ordered that all slogans be over-painted. 

Protests have been redacted. Dissent has been erased. Voices have been silenced.

Carrie Mae Weems. Part of the series: From Here I Saw What Happened and I Cried 1995-96

'The camera gave me an incredible freedom. It gave me the ability to parade through the world and look at people and things very, very closely.’

In another room we see nineteenth century photographs of Black Americans compiled by a scientist to support his racist theory of ethnic hierarchies. Weems has tinted these images blood red and added her own commentary.

‘You became a scientific profile/ a negroid type/ an anthropological debate/ and a photographic subject.’

The photographs are presented in circular form, prompting us to reflect on the man that originally pointed the camera. Who was he? What was he thinking? What was his intent?

'When we’re looking at these images, we’re looking at the ways in which Anglo America - white America - saw itself in relationship to the Black subject. I wanted to intervene in that by giving a voice to a subject that historically has had no voice.'

Carrie Mae Weems. The Louvre from Museums, 2006. © Carrie Mae Weems.

In another series of photographs, we watch Weems in long black dress standing with her back to us, outside the Louvre in Paris, the Guggenheim in Bilbao, and other galleries and museums around the world. The images suggest exclusion, being made unwelcome, being shut out - from viewing and exhibiting; from having your story told; from history.

'It's fair to say that Black folks operate under a cloud of invisibility - this too is part of the work, is indeed central to [my photographs]... This invisibility - this erasure out of the complex history of our life and time - is the greatest source of my longing.’

Carrie Mae Weems, Untitled (Playing Harmonica),1990/99

Weems believes that many of society’s macro-problems begin in micro-relationships.

In her Kitchen Table Series she enacts a woman’s relationships with her partner, her child, her friends. We see anger, affection, boredom, isolation - all around the same simple domestic table under an unforgiving electric light.

'It's impossible to change the social without changing the personal - you have to put your money where your mouth is. And if you're not making those challenges at home, it's unlikely you'll make them in a larger setting.’

Consistently Weems asks us to look again, to look harder; to consider subject and object, medium and message; to reflect on agency and power. She demonstrates that by reframing an image we can be prompted to rethink our assumptions. And even perhaps to react.

‘Photography can be used as a powerful weapon toward instituting political and cultural change. I for one will continue to work toward this end.'

Carrie Mae Weems, portrait by Jerry Klineberg © Carrie Mae Weems

'Possession is the motivation
That is hanging up the God-damn nation.
Looks like we always end up in a rut
Trying to make it real — compared to what?’

Roberta Flack, ‘Compared to What' (G McDaniels)

No. 429

Yevonde: ‘Be Original or Die’

Joan Maude by Yevonde (1932). © National Portrait Gallery, London

'Be original or die would be a good motto for photographers to adopt.’
Yevonde

I recently attended an exhibition of the work of photographer Yevonde. (‘Life and Colour’ is at The National Portrait Gallery, London until 15 October.)

Yevonde captured the Bright Young Things of British Society between the wars. She was the first British photographer to exhibit colour portraits. She shot with style and a light touch, and her images were laced with classical and surreal flourishes. She celebrated beauty, personality, modernity  - and, above all, vibrant, thrilling, luminous colour. 

‘In no phase of modern life has women’s influence proved so stimulating as in photography.’

Yevonde Cumbers was born into a wealthy family in Streatham in 1893. She was educated at progressive schools in England, France and Belgium. Having joined the Suffragette movement, she was prompted by an ad in the newspaper Votes for Women to apply for a job at a portrait photographer’s. After a three-year apprenticeship, and with a gift of £250 from her father, at the age of 21 she set up her own London studio - styling herself Yevonde, or sometimes Madame Yevonde.

‘I took up photography with the definite purpose of making myself independent.’

Yevonde photographed society figures and stage stars, debutantes and dowagers. While her pictures were carefully staged and lit, her approach was informal and witty. This was the golden age of the illustrated press and her work often appeared in magazines like The Tatler and The Sketch. As she gained recognition, she increasingly took advertising commissions too. 

Orchids by Yevonde © National Portrait Gallery, London

‘In almost any other job I must have failed, but by great good luck I had adopted an art-trade-profession-science that, like myself, was not properly ‘grown up.’ I was carried along by a demand which exceeded the supply of the commodity.’

In the early 1930s Yevonde began experimenting with colour photography, using the new Vivex process. This technology employed three negative plates (cyan, magenta and yellow) exposed through a ‘one-shot’ camera and processed separately. Colour photography was frowned upon by the establishment at the time, but she embraced it with gusto. 

‘[Colour photography] has no history, no tradition, no old masters, but only a future!’ 

Red-haired actor Joan Maude is shot in a crimson shawl against a scarlet screen; painter Cathleen Mann, hand on hip, wears a salmon-pink jacket and cloche hat; film star Vivien Leigh, in a cornflower coat, stares into the distance with piercing ice-blue eyes. A model in a bright marmalade and marigold dress, with matching bonnet, clasps a bouquet of yellow orchids. These portraits are vivid, radiant, intense.

Dorothy Emily Evelyn (née Whittall), Lady Campbell as Niobe, Vivex colour print, June 1935 © Yevonde Portrait Archive

Yevonde’s women are surrounded by eye-catching props - flowers, frames and masks. They wear bold shades of lipstick and nail varnish; striking styles of jewellery. 

For her series ‘Goddesses’ Yevonde photographed society women in classical costumes and fantastical settings. Dido is bathed in eerie blue light. Niobe is shot close-up, her azure eyes shedding tears of misery. Minerva, in primrose silk gown, wears a helmet and carries a revolver.

‘There must be arrangement, elimination, imagination.’

Yevonde’s images reveal the changing fashions of the time - shorter hair, dropped waistlines, looser fits - as well as growing female independence. While we sometimes see women engaged in domestic tasks, they are also cycling, smoking, relaxing on the beach. Racing driver Jill Scott sports vermilion overalls, shoes and cap. Artist Natalie Sieveking regards us with casual confidence. A bespectacled debutante in a caramel dress reclines on a sofa engrossed in a scholarly tome.

A Day in the Life of a Debutante: An hour's serious reading (Betty Cowell) by Yevonde © National Portrait Gallery, London

‘The duties of a wife with a separate career have yet to be defined, and although complete unselfishness has always been considered a sure foundation for domestic happiness, I am not convinced.’

In 1939 the Vivex process went out of service and, with the constraints of World War 2, Yevonde returned to working in black and white. She continued to produce portraits and to experiment - in still life fantasies, montage and Solarisation. In 1968 she staged an exhibition marking the 50th anniversary of women’s right to vote. She worked up until her death at the age of 82 in 1975.

Yevonde teaches us to pursue our careers with passion and to embrace new technology with vigour. She also reminds us that colour can be exhilarating, startling, dazzling.

'If we are going to have colour photographs, for heaven’s sake let’s have a riot of colour, none of your wishy washy hand tinted effects.'

Yevonde with Vivex One-Shot Camera, by Yevonde, 1937, © National Portrait Gallery, London

'Loving him is like driving a new Maserati down a dead end street,
Faster than the wind, passionate as sin, ending so suddenly.
Loving him is like trying to change your mind,
Once you're already flying through the free fall.
Like the colors in autumn, so bright, just before they lose it all.
Losing him was blue, like I'd never known.
Missing him was dark grey, all alone.
Forgetting him was like trying to know
Somebody you never met.
But loving him was red,
Loving him was red.’
Taylor Swift, ‘Red'

No. 428

The Dynamics of Chat: Beware Meeting Inflation

Willian Roberts - The Vorticists at the Restaurant de la Tour Eiffel: Spring, 1915 ©The Tate

'A man's character may be learned from the adjectives which he habitually uses in conversation.'
Mark Twain

I have occasionally thought that, were I of a more academic disposition, I would have enjoyed studying the art of conversation. 

It’s always interested me how some discussions – amongst certain people and in particular circumstances - run on fluently, without pause or hesitation, ranging enjoyably across subjects and themes; while other conversations stagger and stumble, falter and fail.

What is the appropriate balance of listening and talking? When is it best to pursue a subject or change it? What is the most productive combination of big and small themes, serious and light topics?

These questions would all form part of my dissertation.

'Polite conversation is rarely either.'
Fran Lebowitz

I recently read an article about the dynamics of chat. (‘Why Conversations are Better with Four People,’ The Times, 12 June)

Professor Robin Dunbar, an anthropologist and evolutionary psychologist at the University of Oxford, has established that the natural upper limit of most discussions tends to be four people.

‘You very rarely get more than four people in a conversation. In the normal run of things, when a fifth person joins a group, it’ll become two conversations within about 20 seconds.’

Alternatively, the addition of a fifth person takes the discussion into a ‘lecture situation’, whereby one person holds court and the other participants switch to audience mode. 

Dunbar explains that when we talk we strive at the same time to read each other’s thoughts; to see the world from each other’s perspectives. This process of ‘mentalising’ helps us navigate comprehension through the imprecise language, vague metaphors and ambiguous phrases of ordinary speech.

Since we can only track what a few people are likely to be thinking at any one time, there are limits on the number of participants in a vibrant discussion. This is why, Dunbar observes, Shakespeare rarely had more than four significant characters speaking in one scene.

'Conversation about the weather is the last refuge of the unimaginative.’
Oscar Wilde

We may recognise this phenomenon from countless dinner parties. 

I confess that when we’re hosting an event I get a little uncomfortable if the discussion splinters and fragments - taking it as an indication that something is flawed in the well-planned social chemistry. Like a nervous sheepdog, I try to corral the conversation back around one theme. But then inevitably I lose control, or risk slipping into ‘lecture mode’ with one of my rusty gambits. It’s very stressful…

'Wit is the salt of conversation, not the food.'
William Hazlitt

Dunbar’s study also has implications in the world of work. 

In the course of my career in advertising, I’m sure there was a good deal of Meeting Inflation: over the years my diary filled up with more meetings, in more formats, attended by more people. There were brainstorms, status meetings and team-building sessions; catch-ups, check-ins and kick-offs; information sharing workshops, planning conferences and performance reviews. And most of these gatherings were attended by more than four people.

With hindsight I think we were endeavouring to break from the traditions of top-down, didactic leadership: seeking to achieve broader representation across disciplines and hierarchies; aiming to make decisions more collegiate. But one has to wonder about the effectiveness of some of these sessions. 

Modern leaders need to be alert to the challenges of Meeting Inflation - mindful that despite the commendable demands for participation and partnership, robust debate and sound decision-making require fewer, not more, attendees. 

If we can reduce Meeting Inflation, perhaps we can raise interest rates.


'I can tell by your eyes
That you've probably been crying forever,
And the stars in the sky don't mean nothing to you,
They're a mirror.
I don't want to talk about it,
How you broke my heart.
If I stay here just a little bit longer,
If I stay here, won't you listen to my heart?’

Everything But the Girl, 'I Don’t Want to Talk About It’ (D Whitten)

No. 427

NDT1: Locations Can Be Characters in Their Own Right

La Ruta ©Rahi Rezvani 2022 for Nederlands Dans Theater

'Someone walks alone/cutting the night into fragments of roads
The night is wounded/ bleeding through the cracks of a dream
Wounds scatter/ the breath of animals asleep/ the perfume of lilies
Eyes close and open/ night remains night’
Gabriela Carrizo

A little while ago I saw a programme of dance by the Nederlands Dans Theater (NDT 1 at the Sadler’s Wells Theatre, London). It was an evening of fierce athleticism, radical movement and provocative ideas. 

I was particularly taken with a piece directed by Argentine choreographer Gabriela Carrizo.

‘La Ruta’ plays out at night in fog beside a busy highway. There’s a glass bus shelter, which is occasionally visited by lonely strangers. There’s a workman in high-vis overalls repairing a junction box. We witness a road accident and a rescue. A seagull crashes against the bus shelter. Another workman comes along to paint some yellow lines. An irate woman falls out of a car with its headlights blazing. ‘F**k you!’ she cries, beating the bonnet with her handbag. She then desperately struggles to remove her trench coat. 

La Ruta ©Rahi Rezvani 2022 for Nederlands Dans Theater

The disparate cast stumble and spin, tumble and turn. And all the while they are accompanied by the incessant noise of passing traffic, by blaring horns, flashing lights and long shadows.

This is the stuff of a noir nightmare. And indeed from the outset we encounter curious characters that don’t seem to make much sense. A couple in kimonos; a man running about with a dead bird; a murderous thug throwing boulders. One poor soul has the heart of a roadkill deer transplanted into his chest. 

'It’s very difficult to organise a dream, because when you organise it, you wake up. When you take control of a dream, you understand that you are sleeping. This is why, to dream you need to be unprotected.'
Teodor Currentzis

Although we were witnessing a fragmented dystopian dream, the piece for me had a compelling coherence. It conveyed a strong sense of place: how it feels to be out late at night, by the side of a road, in the middle of nowhere. It suggested a desolate, unsettling world of loss and isolation; of violence and peril; of strange events and chance encounters.

‘La Ruta’ is bleak, surreal and curiously moving. 

I was struck by the way that this short 35-minute piece managed to mine a great deal from such a simple, ordinary setting. It prompted me to wonder whether, in the communications industry, we spend enough time considering contexts and environments. Do we settle for the commonplace and familiar, the stereotypical and cliched? Or do we create worlds that are vibrant and colourful; intriguing and evocative; rich with symbolism and emotion?

Surely locations can be characters in their own right.

'Come closer and see,
See into the trees.
Find the girl
While you can.
Come closer and see,
See into the dark.
Just follow your eyes,
Just follow your eyes.
I hear her voice,
Calling my name.
The sound is deep
In the dark.
I hear her voice
And start to run,
Into the trees,
Into the trees.’

The Cure, ‘A Forest’ (L Tolhurst / R Smith / S Gallup / M Hartley)

No. 426

Sleepova: Looking Through the Window and Into the Mirror

Copyright © Helen Murray 2023

‘I’ve got Haribo, Maoams, milk choc digestives – dark choc tastes evil - torch, first-aid kit, Swiss Army knife and brought my dad’s laptop.’

A little while ago I saw the excellent play ‘Sleepova' by Matilda Feyiṣayọ Ibini (The Bush Theatre, London). It shines a light on the lives of four Black 16-year-old girls, as they gossip, squabble, quip and debate in the security of their own bedrooms. 

‘Marcus Knight asked me to be his date… He’s the sixth pengest boy in Morrison Boys. He moved up six places, after he got his ear pierced and sorted out his BO.’

Shan has sickle cell disease and is endeavouring to enjoy a normal life. Funmi is smart, curious and interested in reconnecting with her Yoruba heritage. Rey is forthright, gay and privileged. Elle is a Christian with protective parents. 

‘My mum says, why should I be sleeping in other people’s houses when I’m not homeless?’

The girls discuss exams and job prospects, hair and make-up, ice cream and desserts. Their conversation is laced with slang, profanity and cultural references. Sometimes they can be direct, sometimes allusive. Sometimes they can be naïve, sometimes insightful.

Playwright Matilda Feyiṣayọ Ibini

‘Shan, GCSEs are just memory tests. What are we going to do with algebra, magnetism or river formations?’

Romance is quite high on their agenda, and two of the girls fancy Shan’s brother, Solomon (much to her discomfort).

‘I’d be all over him like cocoa butter.’
‘I’d be all over him like Christ’s love for mankind.’

With a school prom approaching, the girls consider whether they should all attend together or take a date.

‘I want to go with Jonah Asamoah in year eleven. I like how his first name rhymes with his surname…He’s really cute. He has dimples, his afro’s always neat and he has braces...When he smiles it actually sparkles, like he’s wearing jewellery but on his teeth.’

As the play progresses the characters have to deal with sexual awakening, sickness and bereavement. They navigate romantic journeys, ideological differences and parental rifts. We see how their friendship is constantly challenged and yet endures.

‘So I’m seeing this new guy Malachi. We met at McDonalds. He works there and he gave me a free McFlurry.
‘Couldn’t give you a free burger? Cheapskate.’

It’s often observed that, while some dramas hold up a mirror to our lives, helping us to see our everyday behaviour in a different light; others help us peer through a window into other people’s worlds, introducing us to cultures and experiences far from our own.

‘Look, the only advice I give straight girls who date boys is never pay for anything. Until society addresses the gender pay gap, make him pay.’

‘Sleepova’ had half the audience looking in the mirror. They were young Londoners laughing along with the jokes, singing along with the tunes, recognising the dilemmas, references and vernacular. The other half of the audience – me included – were peering through a window at a fascinating, charming, mercurial sisterhood.

‘I told him we need to take it slow. Not had a boyfriend before and I don’t want to rush it. Like let me do some research first.’

It struck me that this was a particularly powerful cocktail: combining an audience of insiders and outsiders. It certainly created a vibrant atmosphere in the theatre. Perhaps it’s a dual effect that drama should aim to achieve more often.

‘I’ve been erasing histories for so long, the government doesn’t even know who I really am.’

Inevitably Shan, Funmi, Rey and Elle end up having quite different experiences at the prom.

‘I wish we took more pictures man, I don’t want to forget this night, hashtag nopain, I’m not even tired man.’
‘I can’t wait to get dementia so I can forget this night forever.’

Nonetheless their friendship continues to sustain them with emotional support, laser-sharp wit and occasional words of wisdom.

‘Funmi, I won’t lie to you, it’s going to get worse before it gets better, and then it’s gonna get even more worse, then it might get a little better and you think you’ve finished before it gets worser.’

'I hear every word they talk.
Tried not to care at all.
I know it's frontin’,
Don't know me from nothing.
Still learning to shake it off,
I know I can take it all.
I know they frontin'
You know they frontin', bae.
So if you hear that rah-rah-rah about me,
Talking all out the side of they mouth about me,
I beg you, don't listen.
I beg you, just hear me.
Believe me.
Trust you can see through it all,
Believe through it all,
Breathe through it all.’

Kehlani, ‘Everybody Business’ (C Munoz / C Hugo / K Parrish / K Price / P Williams / S Carter)

No. 425

Don’t Do It Yourself: Why Dogs Trump Pigs at Problem Solving

A little while ago I read in The Times (‘Forget Fido’, 23 January 2023) about a study that compared the problem solving abilities of dogs and pigs.

Both species are considered highly intelligent. Pigs outperform dogs on certain tests and so may be slightly smarter. (In one experiment, for example, pigs were more adept at using a joystick to control a cursor to hit a target.)

Recent research carried out at Eotvos Lorand University in Hungary (published in the journal Scientific Reports) has considered dogs’ and pigs’ broader analytical and communication skills when interacting with humans.

Scientists put 13 pet dogs and 11 miniature pet pigs in a room with their owners and an out-of-reach box containing their favourite food. The animals were then shown that only a human could open the box. 

In the test the dogs animatedly looked back and forth between their owner and the food, securing their help in accessing it. The pigs, however, just stared at the food and got frustrated. 

The researchers concluded that, while pigs may be more intelligent, dogs have the edge in problem solving, thanks to their superior talent for communication. 

'Pigs do not often use visual signals, perhaps partly because of their poor visual acuity - poorer than that of dogs and humans — or due to anatomical restraints such as the rigidity of their neck.’

In my years running a Strategy Department I found that the most intelligent Planners were rarely the most effective at their jobs, or the most successful in their careers. 

My more cerebral team members tended to try to solve problems themselves. They’d shut themselves away with data and research - burning the midnight oil, beavering away in isolation - struggling to crack the code on their own.

The Planners that thrived were generally more resourceful and extrovert. They had emotional as well as rational intelligence, and so sought allies and assistance; provocation and stimulus. 

'I'm not the smartest fellow in the world, but I can sure pick smart colleagues.’
Franklin D Roosevelt

The lesson here is that, when confronted with a knotty strategic task, we should not endeavour to do it all ourselves. We should collaborate to solve. 

'Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence win championships.’
Michael Jordan

One can’t read about the Eotvos Lorand research without feeling some sympathy for the pigs. How frustrating to be outwitted by a less intelligent competitor. I too suffer from a stiff neck and poor eyesight. On reflection, this explains a lot.

'When somebody reaches for your heart,
Open up and let them through.
Because everybody
Needs someone around,
Things can tumble down on you.
You discover,
When you look around,
You don't have to be alone.
Just one lover is all you need to know
When you're feeling all alone.
You might need somebody,
You might need somebody too.’

Randy Crawford, 'You Might Need Somebody’ (Nan O'Byrne, T Snow)

No. 424

After Impressionism: ‘Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?’

Edouard Vuillard Portrait of Lugne-Poe 1891
Memorial Art Gallery of the University of Rochester (New York)

I recently attended ‘After Impressionism,’ an excellent show tracing the development of modern art between the last Impressionist Exhibition of 1886 and the outbreak of the First World War. (The National Gallery, London until 13 August)

The exhibition considers how artists at the dawn of the twentieth century were inspired by the Impressionist spirit of revolution and renewal; and how innovative creative thinking subsequently blossomed across Europe in new cultural hotspots - Barcelona, Berlin, Brussels and Vienna.

Impressionism was characterised by the quest to capture the fleeting moment; the reality of the world around us - with swift strokes of the brush and colours true to the artist’s experience. 

In the wake of this radical movement, Cezanne explored the underlying structures in nature - in landscape, portrait and still life – applying planes of colour that laid the foundations of Cubism. Gaugin went beyond representation of the natural world, using symbolism to convey personal memories and mystical experience. Van Gogh employed bold outlines and ever more intense hues that were charged with emotion. Seurat turned to science to translate light into colour through small dots of complimentary tones. Bonnard and Vuillard flattened their images, giving tranquil domestic scenes a decorative quality.

Vincent Van Gogh - Enclosed Field with Ploughman, 1889

During this period artists looked beyond Europe for inspiration, drawing on Japanese woodblock prints, Polynesian carved objects and African masks.

The creative community thought deeply and debated avidly about the direction they should take with their work. Artists conferred with like-minded modernist writers and formed groups with cool names like the Twenty, the Prophets, the Wild Animals and the Secession. They wrote essays and published journals; held dissident exhibitions and launched radical manifestos.

‘We are tired of the everyday, the near-at-hand, the contemporaneous: we wish to be able to place the symbol in any period, even in dreams.’
Gustave Kahn ‘La Response des Symbolistes’

Hilaire-Germain-Edgar Degas - Combing the Hair ('La Coiffure'). National Gallery, London

The result of all this upheaval and questioning was a period of stunning creative output, diverse in style and approach. At the exhibition you can see Cezanne’s ‘Mont Sainte-Victoire’, a majestic landscape reduced to geometric shapes; Klimt’s ‘Hermine Gallia’, a society lady shimmering in white chiffon; Degas’ ‘Combing the Hair’, an intimate moment all aglow with intoxicating orange. Gaugin presents us with the patriarch Jacob wrestling with an angel, observed by bonneted Breton women. It’s a woozy, dreamlike image. Munch’s ‘Death Bed’ reveals grief in the raw. Mondrian races towards Abstraction before our eyes. And in Ramon Casas’ ‘The Automobile’ an elegant woman drives a car directly at us, headlamps blazing. It is as if she is hurtling towards the future.

‘With faith in growth and in a new generation of creators and those who enjoy art, we call all young people together, and as the young that bear the future within it we shall create for ourselves elbowroom and freedom of life as opposed to the well-entrenched older forces. Everyone who renders directly and honestly whatever drives him to create is one of us.’
German Expressionist Manifesto

Ramon Casas i Carbó - Car. 1902

The exhibition suggests that people working in the creative industries should be arguing, discussing and debating ideas. We should be pioneering new perspectives and practices; experimenting with new partners and inputs.

It prompts us to reflect on our craft: Can we describe what makes our work different? What defines our generation’s outlook and output, in contrast to what has gone before? 

One of Gaugin’s paintings of 1897-8 was entitled ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ Perhaps we should be asking the same questions.

'If you could read my mind, love,
What a tale my thoughts could tell.
Just like an old time movie
About a ghost from a wishing well,
In a castle dark or a fortress strong,
With chains upon my feet.
You know that ghost is me
And I will never be set free.
As long as I'm a ghost, you can't see.’

Gordon Lightfoot, ‘If You Could Read My Mind'

No. 423

Somerset Maugham on Reason and Passion: ‘I Don’t Offer You Happiness. I Offer You Love’

W Somerset Maugham, 1957. Photograph: Jane Bown/The Observer

A little while ago I saw ‘The Circle,’ a splendid 1921 play by W. Somerset Maugham. (The Orange Tree Theatre, Richmond until 17 June)

‘I suppose it’s difficult for the young to realize that one may be old without being a fool.’

Maugham is rarely performed nowadays. Perhaps his writing is a little too polished, his characters a little too aristocratic, for modern tastes. Nonetheless, he was a sharp, witty wordsmith with an eye for the nuances of social attitudes and cultural change, and he has been described as ‘the missing link between Wilde and Coward.’

‘England seems to me full of people doing things they don’t want to because other people expect it of them.’

‘The Circle’ considers the compromises of marriage and the consequences of love. In a lightly humorous way, it asks us to reflect on the true nature of happiness.

‘Man is a gregarious animal. We’re members of a herd. If we break the herd’s laws we suffer for it. And we suffer damnably.’

The action takes place at a Dorset country house where Arnold Champion-Cheney is preparing to meet his mother, Lady Kitty, for the first time since she ran off with her husband’s friend Lord Porteus 30 years ago. 

‘I don’t mean to bear malice, but the fact remains that she did me the most irreparable harm. I can find no excuse for her.’

Arnold is a somewhat stiff fellow, who serves as an MP and is primarily interested in politics and furniture.

‘It always makes me uncomfortable when people are effusive.’

Oivia Vinall and Chirag Benedict Lobo in The Circle, photo by Ellie Kurttz

Elizabeth, Arnold's wife of three years, is, by contrast, a romantic. She rather admires Lady Kitty for sacrificing her social standing for love, and she has engineered the reunion.  

‘When you’re loved as she’s loved, you may grow old, but you grow old beautifully.’

Elizabeth is beginning to find life as a rural MP’s wife terribly tedious, and she is falling in love with Teddy Luton, her husband’s friend, a charming businessman visiting from Malaya.

It looks like history is about to repeat itself.

As the drama plays out, it transpires that the Champion-Cheneys' guests are not quite the idyllic couple Elizabeth has imagined. Lord Porteus is grumpy and combative. Lady Kitty is selfish and frivolous.

‘My dear, her soul is as thickly rouged as her face.’

Nonetheless Elizabeth is convinced that her relationship with Arnold is redundant.

‘A marriage without love is no marriage at all…When two people are married it’s very difficult for one of them to be unhappy without making the other unhappy too.’

At this point Lady Kitty speaks out for her son, warning Elizabeth that infatuation fades.

‘It breaks my heart to think that you’re going to make the same pitiful mistake that I made… One sacrifices one’s life for love and then one finds that love doesn’t last. The tragedy of love isn’t death or separation. One gets over them. The tragedy of love is indifference.’

As Elizabeth oscillates between fidelity and romance; reason and passion; staying and going, Teddy makes a desperate plea for her to start a new life with him.

'But I wasn’t offering you happiness. I don’t think my sort of love tends to happiness. I’m jealous. I’m not a very easy man to get on with. I’m often out of temper and irritable. I should be fed to the teeth with you sometimes, and so would you be with me. I daresay we’d fight like cat and dog, and sometimes we’d hate each other. Often you’d be wretched and bored stiff and lonely, and often you’d be frightfully homesick, and then you’d regret all you’d lost. Stupid women would be rude to you because we’d run away together. And some of them would cut you. I don’t offer you peace and quietness. I offer you unrest and anxiety. I don’t offer you happiness. I offer you love.’

I was quite taken with Teddy Luton’s speech. 

We spend a good deal of time nowadays reflecting on happiness. We survey the most ‘liveable’ towns and cities, the most agreeable countries and cultures. We calculate and calibrate our own personal satisfaction and wellbeing. We create happiness indexes. The assumption is that all of our decisions, in life and work, should ultimately add up to a higher level of contentment.

Yet perhaps happiness is not all it’s cracked up to be. 

‘There is no more lamentable pursuit than a life of pleasure.’

If we narrowly judge careers against a set of logical contentment criteria; against an imagined goal of enduring happiness, we may end up pursuing a path that is ultimately unfulfilling. Sometimes there’s reward to be found in struggle and challenge; in passion and devotion; in ‘unrest and anxiety’.

Perhaps we should seek a job we love rather than one that makes us happy.

In raising questions about marriage and the conventional understanding of fulfilment, Maugham was somewhat ahead of his time. ‘The Circle’ was booed on its opening night. But I suspect he would have reassured himself that he was ‘merely a very truthful man’.

‘I never know whether you’re a humorist or a cynic, Father.’
‘I’m neither, my dear boy; I’m merely a very truthful man. But people are so unused to the truth that they’re apt to mistake it for a joke or a sneer.’

'My thoughts go back to a heavenly dance,
A moment of bliss we spent.
Our hearts were filled with a song of romance
As into the night we went,
And sang to our hearts’ content.
The song is ended,
But the melody lingers on.
You and the song are gone,
But the melody lingers on.’

Annette Hanshaw, 'The Song Is Ended (but the Melody Lingers On)' (Irving Berlin)

No. 422

Trying To Be Cool About It: An Overheard Altercation with Fabien

© The artist's estate. Photo credit: Fry Art Gallery

‘Right, Fabien, I’m not having this conversation.’

A bald chap with a backpack and casual business attire had just boarded my busy train at Waterloo. He was talking loudly into his phone and was somewhat vexed.

‘If he asks me if I’ve spoken to Fabien, I’m gonna say no.’

I obviously couldn’t hear what Fabien had to say for himself, but the man felt he had some explaining to do.

‘Look, he told me to cc her and so I did. There was nothing I could do.’ 

He was clearly struggling to make his point.

‘I understand you, Fabien, but you don’t understand me. I told you: Matthew is uncontactable and Ainsley is panicking. All I’m asking you to do is not lie.’

There was a good deal of repetition and exclamation. And the conversation finished unsatisfactorily.

‘I’m gonna stop there, Fabien. You’re still not getting it.’

The man hung up and slumped back in his seat.

‘F**k!’

 An uneasy atmosphere lingered in the train carriage. 

The brief altercation had embraced deception, indiscretion, inconsistency and anger. I found myself wondering whether the events that prompted the dispute had merited all this emotion. 

'Anybody can become angry - that is easy. But to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way - that is not within everybody's power and is not easy.’
Aristotle

Sometimes in the world of work, we let people get under our skin, we get hot under the collar. I once kicked a bin over because a package had not been delivered. I regretted it immediately, realising that only a rare few look good when they’re annoyed - Marlon Brando, Joe Pesci, Jack Nicholson, for example. When I kicked that bin I came across more like Norman Wisdom.

We ought to take our jobs seriously. It’s only by doing so that we can extract any satisfaction from them. But we should be aware that intense concentration and a narrow focus can result in a disproportionate response to setbacks. The blood pressure rises and the red mist descends. We can’t help getting irritated and indignant.

'The greatest remedy for anger is delay.'
Thomas Paine

It’s always best to take a breath and count to 10. The issue at hand probably doesn’t matter that much. And if it does matter, then it deserves a considered, calculated reply. We should ‘try to be cool about it.’

Perhaps that’s what the irate bald man should have said to Fabien.

'I'm trying to be cool about it,
Feeling like an absolute fool about it.
Wishing you were kind enough to be cruel about it,
Telling myself I can always do without it,
Knowin' that it probably isn't true.’

boygenius, ‘Cool About It’ (J Baker / L Dacus / P Simon / P Bridgers)

No. 421